Consumo habitual de café y riesgo de eventos cerebrovasculares / Regular coffee consumption and stroke risk

Resumen Introducción: La enfermedad cerebrovascular es causa frecuente de morbimortalidad y, en ese sentido, el consumo de café tiene un impacto cardiovascular, por lo cual es importante evaluar la evidencia respecto a la asociación entre su consumo y la enfermedad cerebrovascular. Objetivo: Evaluar la asociación entre consumo de café y riesgo de morbimortalidad por enfermedad cerebrovascular. Método: Se realizó una búsqueda en las bases Medline, EMBASE, LILACS y Cochrane (enero de 1966 a junio de 2018) y se seleccionaron revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis evaluados de forma estandarizada y pareada. Se seleccionaron seis publicaciones. Resultados: Se encontró que el consumo de café en rango moderado (hasta cuatro tazas) se asocia a una reducción del riesgo de enfermedad cerebrovascular (riesgo relativo [RR] = 0.89, intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 0.81-0.97, y RR: 0.83, IC95%: 0.75-0.91). Esta protección se mantiene en el subgrupo de mujeres, con reducciones del 13% (IC95%: 0.78-0.97) para una taza, del 16% (IC95%: 0.74-0.95) para dos tazas y 19% (RR: 0.81; IC95%: 0.70-0.93) (IC95%: 0.70-0.93) para cuatro o más tazas. Los hallazgos también son significativos para el subtipo isquémico (RR = 0.80; IC95%: 0.71-0.90). Conclusiones: El consumo de café reduce el riesgo de eventos cerebrovasculares entre un 11% y un 17%, y esto se mantiene en el subgrupo de mujeres y en el subtipo isquémico.

Abstract Introduction: Cerebrovascular disease is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality and, in this sense, coffee consumption has a cardiovascular impact, which is why it is important to evaluate the evidence regarding the association between its consumption and cerebrovascular disease. Objective: To evaluate the association between coffee consumption and risk of morbidity and mortality due to cerebrovascular disease. Method: A search was carried out in the Medline, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane databases (January 1966 to June 2018), selecting systematic reviews and meta-analyzes evaluated in a standardized and paired way. Six publications were selected. Results: it was found that the consumption of coffee in a moderate range (up to 4 cups) is associated with a reduction in the risk of cerebrovascular disease (relative risk [RR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.81- 0.97, and RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.91). This protection is maintained in the subgroup of women, with reductions of 13% (95% CI: 0.78-0.97) for a cup, 16% (95% CI: 0.74-0.95) for two cups, and RR = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70-0.93) for four or more cups. The findings are also significant for the ischemic subtype (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.90). Conclusions: Coffee consumption reduces the risk of cerebrovascular events between 11% and 17%, and this is maintained in the subgroup of women and in the ischemic subtype.

Eficacia y seguridad del uso de medicamentos para la cesación de la adicción al tabaco: revisión de guías de práctica clínica / Efficacy and safety of medication use for the cessation of tobacco addiction: Are view of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Objetivo Revisar la eficacia y seguridad de medicamentos para cesación del tabaquismo en el contexto de construcción de guías de práctica clínica (GPC). Métodos Revisión sistemática de GPC para adaptación mediante ADAPTE. Los desenlaces fueron cesación ≥6 meses y seguridad de las intervenciones. Las GPC se calificaron por pares con DELBI. Se extrajeron resultados de estudios agregativos incluidos en las guías seleccionadas. Resultados Los fármacos duplican la cesación comparados con placebo (tasas de 25,0 % hasta 27,0 % al combinarse con consejería). Los mayores incrementos en cesación se obtienen con ansiolíticos y antidepresivos (8,7% a 19,4%), y los menores con terapia de reemplazo nicotínico -TRN- (5,2% a 12,9%). La nortriptilina tiene eficacia similar al bupropion (aproximadamente 10,0 %). Con limitadas excepciones (parche e inhalador, tabletas y bupropion), las combinaciones de medicamentos no incrementan la abstinencia. Conclusiones TRN, vareniclina, bupropion y nortriptilina son eficaces para dejar de fumar. Las combinaciones de medicamentos requieren más evidencia y deberían restringirse a personas con alta dependencia o con falla terapéutica inicial. Serían deseables análisis de costo-efectividad para valorar implementación de programas en países en desarrollo.

Objective To review the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in the context of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods A systematic review of CPGs was conducted, aimed at adapting recommendations for Colombia following the ADAPTE methodology. Outcomes comprised 6-months or higher smoking cessation rates and intervention safety. CPGs were peer-assessed based on DELBI. Results from aggregative studies included in selected CPGs were obtained. Results Pharmacotherapy doubles smoking cessation rates as compared with placebos (rates @25% and up to 27 % when combined with counseling). The highest efficacy was observed for ansyolitic and antidepressive drugs (8.7 % to 19.4 %), and the lowest for nicotine replacement therapy -NRT- (5.2 % to 12.9 %). Nortriptiline shows an efficacy similar to that of bupropion (@10%). With limited exceptions, combined pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation has shown no significant increase in cessation rates. Conclusions NRT, varenicline, bupropion and nortriptiline are effective treatments for smoking cessation. Combination of drugs deserves further clinical evidence and should be restricted to highly dependent smokers or initial therapeutic failure. Cost-effectiveness analyses might help to introduce smoking cessation programs in low and middle income countries.

[Efficacy and safety of medication use for the cessation of tobacco addiction: A review of Clinical Practice Guidelines]. / Eficacia y seguridad del uso de medicamentos para la cesación de la adicción al tabaco: revisión de guías de práctica clínica.

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in the context of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). METHODS: A systematic review of CPGs was conducted, aimed at adapting recommendations for Colombia following the ADAPTE methodology. Outcomes comprised 6-months or higher smoking cessation rates and intervention safety. CPGs were peer-assessed based on DELBI. Results from aggregative studies included in selected CPGs were obtained. RESULTS: Pharmacotherapy doubles smoking cessation rates as compared with placebos (rates @25% and up to 27 % when combined with counseling). The highest efficacy was observed for ansyolitic and antidepressive drugs (8.7 % to 19.4 %), and the lowest for nicotine replacement therapy -NRT- (5.2 % to 12.9 %). Nortriptiline shows an efficacy similar to that of bupropion (@10%). With limited exceptions, combined pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation has shown no significant increase in cessation rates. CONCLUSIONS: NRT, varenicline, bupropion and nortriptiline are effective treatments for smoking cessation. Combination of drugs deserves further clinical evidence and should be restricted to highly dependent smokers or initial therapeutic failure. Cost-effectiveness analyses might help to introduce smoking cessation programs in low and middle income countries.